For creators, teams & agencies

The correction always costs more than the check.

Factwick pulls the checkable claims out of your draft, organises the evidence for and against each one, and produces a citation-backed report — with honest "unresolved" where the internet didn't deliver. No manufactured certainty, no invented sources.

The live demo opens a checked article in one click — no signup, no card. Works out of the box with a demonstration corpus; plug in a search API key for live web evidence. Prefer a guided walkthrough? See how it works.

How it works

From "sounds right" to "here's the source"

Paste the draft, get the checkable claims

Deterministic heuristics flag every sentence with a number, a trend, a superlative or a 'studies show' — the statements that embarrass you later. You choose which ones matter; add anything the heuristics missed.

Gather sources you can defend

Search through a pluggable provider or add sources by hand. Every source records publisher, publication date and — crucially — the retrieval date. Paywalled, unavailable and stale sources are labelled, not hidden.

Set stances, not vibes

Each source gets an explicit stance per claim: supports, contradicts, inconclusive — with your note. Verdicts derive from the evidence table, and a claim with no sources stays honestly 'unresolved'. The system cannot manufacture a citation; there is no code path for it.

Review, approve, attach the receipt

A named reviewer finalises each verdict — supported and contradicted require linked evidence. The printable report lists every source with dates, and unresolved claims say 'verify before publishing' in plain words.

Why careful teams trust it

Not a truth machine

Factwick organises evidence and disagreement; humans judge. "Mixed" and "unresolved" are first-class verdicts because that's what honest verification actually looks like.

Costs under control

Search calls are rate-limited per workspace and every query is logged. The search provider is an adapter — swap it without touching the product.

Team review built in

Verdicts carry the reviewer's name and date. Projects can only be approved when every selected claim has been dealt with — including honestly marking what couldn't be settled.

See a checked article in the demo

The demo workspace contains a fictional marketing article with accurate, outdated, misleading and unverifiable claims — each resolved the way a careful team would.

Explore the demo